Skip to main content

  • The ability of contemporary cardiologists to judge the ischemic impact of a coronary lesion visually

    • Posted: 02/20/2024
    • Author:

      Michael Foley, Christopher A. Rajkumar, Fiyyaz Ahmed-Jushuf, Daniel Nour, Chi Ho Fung, Henry Seligman, Rachel H. Pathimagaraj, Ricardo Petraco, Sayan Sen, Sukhjinder Nijjer, James P. Howard, Yousif Ahmad, Usaid Allahwala, Ravinay Bhindi, Daniel Chamie, Shunich Doi, Shingo Kuwata, Toshiki Kaihara, Masashi Koga, Yuki Ishibashi, Takumi Higuma, Yasuhiro Tanabe, Masafumi Nakayama, Yoshiaki Kawase, Akifumi Watanabe, Naohiro Funayama, Ryo Horinaka, Nobuhiro Hijikata, Takamichi Takahashi, Hitoshi Matsuo, Peter S. Hansen, Andre Manica, James Weaver, Karam Alzuhairi, Thon-Hon Yong, Takayuki Warisawa, Darrel P. Francis, Matthew J. Shun-Shin and Rasha K. Al-Lamee

    • 2024CRM

    Abstract

    Background

    Landmark trials showed that invasive pressure measurement (Fractional Flow Reserve, FFR) was a better guide to coronary stenting than visual assessment. However, present-day interventionists have benefited from extensive research and personal experience of mapping anatomy to hemodynamics.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details