Skip to main content
  • Editorial: Where There Is Not ‘Pre-Closure’, Will ‘Post-Closure’ Tackle it?!

    The use of temporary percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for cardiogenic shock (CS) and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HRPCI) is increasing in the United States  . Most MCS devices require large-bore access for insertion with sheath sizes often upward of 14 Fr, making them prone to access-site complications such as hematoma, bleeding, pseudoaneurysm, and limb ischemia. In particular, bleeding with use of large-bore access is associated with worse outcomes including longer length and higher costs of hospital stay, and higher mortality  . Thus, it is necessary to implement meticulous insertion and removal techniques for these MCS devices to minimize complications and related adverse outcomes.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details