Skip to main content
  • Editorial: Does Size Matter? Investigating the Role of Optimal Vessel Sizing for the Endovascular Treatment of Infrapopliteal Vascular Disease

    Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and diminished quality of life. Infrapopliteal (below-the-knee [BTK]) peripheral vascular disease is frequently the sole or a contributing cause of CLI. Unfortunately, successful and durable revascularization for BTK vascular disease has been difficult to achieve. Schmidt et al. examined the results of angioplasty for long (>80 mm) infrapopliteal lesions ( n = 77) and reported 3-month angiographic restenosis in 68.8% of patients with a 37.6% re-occlusion rate  . A meta-analysis including 52 studies of patients treated with angioplasty for symptomatic infrapopliteal disease (6769 patients and 9399 lesions) reported a technical success of 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.8% to 93.0%), one-year outcomes included; primary patency of only 63.1% (95% CI 57.3% to 68.6%), incidence of repeat revascularization 18.2% (95% CI 14.5% to 22.6%), major amputation rate 14.9% (95% CI 12.3% to 18.0%), and an all-cause mortality of 15.1% (CI 12.8% to 17.7%)  . Another meta-analysis of 44 studies examining revascularization for infrainguinal CLI (8602 patients) also reported low one-year patency rates for angioplasty (66%), bare metal stents (BMS) (50%), and drug-eluting stents (DES) (73%) with declining patency at 3 years (10% for BMS and 49% for DES) 

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details