Skip to main content
  • Editorial: Defining the problem, the first step to making progress in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock care

    Acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) remains a disease state associated with high morbidity and mortality. There have been three distinct eras within modern medicine defining AMI-CS care. The first era compromised treatment with vasoactive agents, use of intra-aortic balloon pumps and thrombolytic therapy and was associated with a mortality of 80 %. The second era included the advent of revascularization, particularly percutaneous coronary interventions, which improved AMI-CS mortality to 50 % [ 1 ]. The third and present era includes the use of shock protocols and teams which more frequently utilize early mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices guided by invasive hemodynamics [ 2 , 3 ]. While there is hope that mortality will be further enhanced, data available to date remain highly selected.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details