The prognostic role of microvascular resistance reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Methods
We performed a systematic search in 3 different databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus). After selecting all appropriate studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a random effect meta-analysis was performed.
Results
Our analysis, including 5 studies and a total of 1605 (453 abnormal MRR; 1152 normal MRR) patients, shows that patients with abnormal MRR are at significantly higher risk for cardiovascular death [Risk Ratio (RR): 4.88 95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 3.49–6.83], major adverse cardiovascular events (RR: 2.37; 95%CI: 1.52–3.70), myocardial infarction (RR: 1.93; 95%CI: 1.53–2.42) and heart failure hospitalizations (RR: 4.83; 95%CI: 1.59–14.70), in comparison to the normal MRR cohort. As expected, abnormal MRR was not associated with a significantly higher risk of future
revascularizations, compared to normal controls (RR: 1.29; 95%CI: 0.52–3.19).