Left atrial appendage occlusion optimized with artificial intelligence-guided CT pre-planning and intra-procedural intracardiac echocardiographic guidance
Abstract
Methods
This single-center retrospective cohort study from 2021 to 2024 compared TEE-guided LAAO to a method combining artificial intelligence-augmented CT preplanning and ICE. The primary outcome of the study was a composite of procedural success, incidence of device-related thrombus, and peri-device leaks ≥5 mm at 45 days. Secondary outcomes included procedural duration, contrast volume, device recaptures, and resizing.
Results
The study included 143 patients: 46 in the CT/ICE arm and 97 in the TEE arm. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. The number of males was statistically higher in the CT/ICE arm (76.1 % vs. 58.8 %
p = 0.043). Procedural success was similar between groups (97.8 % vs. 95.9 %,
p = 0.899). At 45 days, device-related thrombus (2.2 % vs. 0 %, p = 0.145) and peri-device leaks were similar (8.7 % vs. 4.1 %,
p = 0.266) in both groups. The CT/ICE group had significantly fewer device recaptures (0.0 ± 0.1 vs. 0.2 ± 0.4,
p = 0.001) and devices attempted (1.0 ± 0.2 vs. 1.2 ± 0.4,
p = 0.002).