Skip to main content
  • Editorial: Coronary bifurcation physiology: Better models and more data needed

    Atherosclerotic disease involving coronary artery bifurcations continues to be a perplexing and difficult subject. This is nowhere more evident than in their physiological assessment. With a coronary bifurcation, there are three arterial segments to evaluate: 1) the main branch proximal to the bifurcation (MB-proximal); 2) the main branch distal to the bifurcation (MB-distal); 3) the side branch (SB). This arrangement is the anatomic basis for the Medina classification, a system proven useful in understanding bifurcation lesions and their treatment (Fig. 1) [1]. However, the multiple possible permutations of lesion anatomy, along with frequently encountered difficulties in manipulating guidewires and pressure-wires into the side branch, make physiological assessment of bifurcation lesions more challenging, and therefore less often performed.
    Fig. 1
    1. Download: Download high-res image (146KB)
    2. Download: Download full-size image

    Fig. 1. Possible combinations of coronary artery and microvascular disease states influencing FFR in coronary bifurcation lesions.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details